A Time Capsule from the Last Century: On Whatever Works
June 29th, 2009 |A Film Review by Tyson Stewart
Starring Larry David and Evan Rachel Wood. Written and Directed by Woody Allen.
This is Allen’s funniest film in the last ten years. Well-acted, funny, smart, and even romantic, the year’s first worthwhile film combines the talents of two giants of comedy. The humour may be a tad out of date, but, in a strange way, this is also its strength. It has the pace of his earlier films, like Sleeper and Annie Hall, and the zany antics and exaggerated characterizations of Everything You Always Wanted to Know About Sex…But Were Afraid to Ask or Broadway Danny Rose. In short, it doesn’t have the sluggishness and bad timing of his comedies from The Curse of the Jade Scorpion onwards. A possible reason for this return to form: the script was written in the 1970s and Woody quickly updated it before the potential actors’ strike last year!
David’s Boris is full of opinions and complaints about modern times, and the film’s satirical elements work the best when it lovingly scorns dumb Southerners. In fact, I’d take this kind of satire of American culture over the National Lampoon films any day. David is more of a moaner than a joke-teller (like Allen) but somehow this works. Their worldview is basically the same, and this is maybe why the film plays out so smoothly. Unrelenting pessimism and anger at the world have never been so enjoyable: it’s much harder to find humour in death and the meaninglessness of life than, for example, a hangover. Woody Allen belongs to the 20th century, not the 21st but it is important that his worldview remains forever on offer: it is the sensibility of the Jew as witness to death.
On the aesthetic-technical side, we enjoyed the title song pulled from Animal Crackers, the breezy New Orleans jazz score used throughout, and the signature long-duration shots without too much coverage. I appreciate the way Allen shoots his scenes: one take is the general rule: this allows the actors to really become the character for it doesn’t completely break up the “life” of the character into little ad-like bits.
When Boris addresses the audience, I asked myself if this type of self-reflexivity still works. The opening monologue is probably longer than the one that opens Autumn Sonata: it’s fucking long. Maybe he should have utilized voice-over throughout to frame things. Only a few lines in the direct address moments are interesting, and they go something like this: “Why do you want to know my story? Do we know each other? Do we like each other?” and, near the end, “There were people in the audience at the start. I don’t know how many are left though.” Lines like these remind us of how most other films are so confident in their ability to relate a character’s story even if they use the same old conventional narrative practises to do so. Boris has a point: why do we see films about people we can’t stand made by filmmakers that are complicit in their characters’ development?
Finally, don’t believe those critics who say it’s one of his worst films. And while you’re at it, don’t believe those (like me) who say it’s one of his best. But a good film it is. And I’d take this over any other movie out right now. I know that’s not saying much…Anyway, go see it.








Recent Comments
Hi Great to see a review about this super cool band - too...
Seriously... this is my favorite album by them - besides may...
i agree completely is this album based on a specific book? t...
Hey people, You don't really understand ASMZ's spirit......
Great list, but in my subjetive vision, I missed some of the...